Sunday, March 9, 2025

Consider the Atoms

 


From Guy Nancarrow March 8 at 1:01PM  Admin of 'Carl Sagan's Vision'


'Consider the atoms. For 13.8 billion years, they drifted in the void—simple, silent, bound only by gravity and chance. Then, on a tiny rock orbiting an unremarkable star, something extraordinary

happened: dead matter began to dream.

 

Carl Sagan warned us: “Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” Earth’s fossil record is a graveyard of experiments—trilobites, dinosaurs, towering ferns—all reduced to dust by asteroid strikes, ice ages, and oxygen famines. Yet here we are, the heirs of survivors, our DNA a palimpsest of 600 million years of neural improvisation. Your reflexes—the flinch from fire, the hunger for sweetness, the urge to protect a child—are ancient algorithms, sculpted by trial and error in a world where death was the default. 

Daniel Dennett’s insight cuts deep: “You don’t need a smart maker to make something simple.” Evolution is no blacksmith. It is a blind sculptor, chiseling life from randomness. A single-celled organism, mindless and hungry, splits into two. Over eons, those splits compound into eyes, wings, brains. Complexity emerges not by design, but by desperation—a billion tiny solutions to the cold arithmetic of survival. 

 

But it was Charles Darwin who shattered the illusion. Before him, life’s tapestry seemed threaded by divine hands. Darwin revealed a cosmos where dead matter, through patient iteration, could wake itself into being. No deity counted the sparrows; no plan guided the finch’s beak. Life was not bestowed—it emerged, a slow dance of mutation and necessity. His revelation was humbling: We are accidents with ancestry, stardust that learned to count its own steps. 

And what of us? For millennia, we told ourselves that gods or kings authored the cosmos. Then came Newton, who saw a universe governed by a few elegant equations. Einstein rewrote them, bending spacetime to his will. Hubble peered into the abyss and found galaxies fleeing into darkness, proof that the universe is neither static nor eternal. These were not discoveries of complexity, but of profound simplicity—laws so concise they could fit on a napkin, yet powerful enough to birth black holes and DNA. 

But here lies the paradox: From simplicity, complexity blooms. Dead matter stirs to life. Neurons fire into sentience. A species that once cowered in caves now builds rockets and writes sonnets. Your smartphone—a slab of glass and rare earth metals—contains more computational power than all the brains of the Cretaceous period. Yet it was forged not by a genius, but by the slow accretion of human curiosity, each breakthrough standing on the shoulders of ancestral tinkerers. 

 

We are the universe waking up. The same hydrogen born in the Big Bang now courses through your veins. The same thermodynamics that drags stars toward entropy also powers your cells, turning sunlight into thought. For 600 million years, life clawed its way from reflex to reason, from survival to poetry. And in the last sliver of cosmic time—a mere 0.000007% of Earth’s history—we glimpsed the truth: We are not above nature, but of it.Consider the atoms. For 13.8 billion years, they drifted in the void—simple, silent, bound only by gravity and chance. Then, on a tiny rock orbiting an unremarkable star, something extraordinary

happened: dead matter began to dream.

 

Carl Sagan warned us: “Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” Earth’s fossil record is a graveyard of experiments—trilobites, dinosaurs, towering ferns—all reduced to dust by asteroid strikes, ice ages, and oxygen famines. Yet here we are, the heirs of survivors, our DNA a palimpsest of 600 million years of neural improvisation. Your reflexes—the flinch from fire, the hunger for sweetness, the urge to protect a child—are ancient algorithms, sculpted by trial and error in a world where death was the default. 

Daniel Dennett’s insight cuts deep: “You don’t need a smart maker to make something simple.” Evolution is no blacksmith. It is a blind sculptor, chiseling life from randomness. A single-celled organism, mindless and hungry, splits into two. Over eons, those splits compound into eyes, wings, brains. Complexity emerges not by design, but by desperation—a billion tiny solutions to the cold arithmetic of survival. 

 

But it was Charles Darwin who shattered the illusion. Before him, life’s tapestry seemed threaded by divine hands. Darwin revealed a cosmos where dead matter, through patient iteration, could wake itself into being. No deity counted the sparrows; no plan guided the finch’s beak. Life was not bestowed—it emerged, a slow dance of mutation and necessity. His revelation was humbling: We are accidents with ancestry, stardust that learned to count its own steps. 

And what of us? For millennia, we told ourselves that gods or kings authored the cosmos. Then came Newton, who saw a universe governed by a few elegant equations. Einstein rewrote them, bending spacetime to his will. Hubble peered into the abyss and found galaxies fleeing into darkness, proof that the universe is neither static nor eternal. These were not discoveries of complexity, but of profound simplicity—laws so concise they could fit on a napkin, yet powerful enough to birth black holes and DNA. 

But here lies the paradox: From simplicity, complexity blooms. Dead matter stirs to life. Neurons fire into sentience. A species that once cowered in caves now builds rockets and writes sonnets. Your smartphone—a slab of glass and rare earth metals—contains more computational power than all the brains of the Cretaceous period. Yet it was forged not by a genius, but by the slow accretion of human curiosity, each breakthrough standing on the shoulders of ancestral tinkerers. 

 

We are the universe waking up. The same hydrogen born in the Big Bang now courses through your veins. The same thermodynamics that drags stars toward entropy also powers your cells, turning sunlight into thought. For 600 million years, life clawed its way from reflex to reason, from survival to poetry. And in the last sliver of cosmic time—a mere 0.000007% of Earth’s history—we glimpsed the truth: We are not above nature, but of it.'

Did Somebody Mention 'Chinese Whispers'?

 


Imagine this scene in Judea or Anatolia or Alexandria:

 ‘Hey! Have you heard about this guy in Galilee? Jesus?

Man, loads of great stories about this dude. Got a minute?

He walked on water! No kidding. I know a guy who knows a guy who knew a guy that said he knew a guy who saw him do it. My cousin told me about it and my cousin wouldn’t lie about it. Very trustworthy dude; not too bright but he wouldn’t lie to me about this. 

Walked on water during a big storm on the Sea of Galilee. This guy, Jeshua ben Josef  I guess is his real name – a Jewish fella – palled around with fishermen, apparently. Anyway, aint that something?

Walked on water!

And he turned water into wine! Man, if I could do that, I could make a fortune!  I could stop being a tanner for one thing. Set up shop. Turn water into wine and make a fortune. 

So, anyway this Jesus guy; he went to a wedding and turned water into wine! Pretty cool, right?

No, he wasn’t just a magician. He did all kinds of magic stuff but…

Like I heard tell that he fed thousands of people with a just a few loaves of bread and a couple of fish! He multiplied that little bit and fed a multitude. That’s what I heard. No kidding!

But he never charged anyone. Man, I’d make a bundle but this guy, Jesus, did it to show he was special. Son of god or something.

But wait – one more – he came back from the dead! After being crucified, he came back from the dead. I shit you not! That’s what my cousin told me! Came back from the dead.

Okay. So that’s a bridge too far for you? Too much? My cousin swears by it, though. If you knew my cousin, you’d know he wouldn’t lie to me about such stuff. Really.

When was this? About 40 years ago or so, I guess.’

Now, imagine this scene being played out many times. Hear-say, gossip, tall tales all told with a level of fervency that would dispel doubt. 

Now, imagine that the stories are told in variations with embellishments and hyperbole to increase the effect of the stories upon the listener much as rumor and gossip is altered for effect. Now, imagine all this being done in various languages with colloquial nuance, asides and references. 

That might be what the first Gospel writer (whoever they were) might have used as the basis for ‘Mark’.

I am an Atheist